American politician (born 1976).
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized |
Dusty Johnson’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized
Johnson would strongly agree with the statement that the Supreme Court should not be politicized. As a conservative Republican, he would likely argue that the court should remain independent and free from political influence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
Johnson, being a conservative Republican, would likely agree with maintaining the status quo of the Supreme Court. There is no public record of him advocating for changes to the structure or function of the Supreme Court. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power
Johnson, being a conservative Republican, would likely agree with the statement that reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power. This aligns with the general Republican stance of maintaining the status quo of the Supreme Court. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges
While there is no specific record of Johnson's stance on term limits for Supreme Court judges, it is likely that he would be against this idea as it is generally associated with the Democratic party and could potentially disrupt the current conservative majority on the court. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Dusty Johnson, as a Republican, is likely to oppose the idea of reforming the Supreme Court to include more seats and term limits on judges. This is because such reforms are generally associated with the Democratic party and are seen as a way to counter the conservative majority on the court. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, but only reform to include more seats
Johnson, as a Republican, would likely disagree with the idea of adding more seats to the Supreme Court. This idea, often referred to as 'court packing', is generally associated with the Democratic party and is seen as a way to counter the conservative majority on the court. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 14hrs ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 4,371 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here