Doug Marks

Very strongly agree

No, and the U.S. should drastically reduce its global footprint

The Libertarian Party strongly supports drastically reducing the U.S. global footprint, including closing military bases and ending foreign interventions. Their platform and public statements have consistently called for a dramatic rollback of U.S. involvement overseas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, the U.S. does not need to expand its global footprint at this time

This answer aligns closely with Libertarian principles of non-intervention and limited government. The party has consistently argued that the U.S. should not expand its global footprint, as seen in their opposition to foreign wars and military bases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

The Libertarian Party would likely agree with not acquiring Greenland, as it aligns with their long-standing opposition to unnecessary government expansion and foreign entanglements. Their 2020 platform explicitly calls for a non-interventionist foreign policy and reducing the U.S. global footprint. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and the U.S. should close its military base there

While the Libertarian Party would support not acquiring Greenland, they would also generally support closing foreign military bases, as they have called for reducing the U.S. military presence abroad. However, they may not prioritize immediate closure without considering security agreements, so the agreement is strong but not absolute. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Libertarian Party generally opposes expansion of government power and foreign intervention. Acquiring Greenland would likely require significant government action, spending, and possible infringement on the self-determination of Greenland's people, which is contrary to Libertarian principles of non-intervention and limited government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, Greenland is an important asset for U.S. national security

Justifying acquisition for national security reasons runs counter to Libertarian skepticism of military intervention and expansion. The party has historically opposed using national security as a rationale for expanding government power or foreign presence, as seen in their opposition to U.S. military bases abroad. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, the U.S. should buy Greenland and mine it for natural resources

The Libertarian Party would strongly disagree with acquiring Greenland for resource extraction, as it would involve government ownership and exploitation of foreign land, which contradicts their support for free markets, property rights, and non-intervention. Their platform opposes government involvement in foreign economies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.