Try the political quiz

Dean Phillips’ policy on campaign finance

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should there be a limit to the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor?

  Dean Phillips voterbaseYes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors

Dean Phillips’ answer is based on the following data:

Updated 8hrs ago

Dean Phillips voters

Answer: Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 365 voters that have pledged to vote for Dean Phillips in the 2024 Presidential election.

Party influence

Democratic Party Answer: Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors

Importance: Less Important

Reference: “Democrats denounced it as an assault on democracy and a sop to billionaires when the Supreme Court issued a ruling two years ago...” ‐nytimes.com

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Yes

Dean Phillips has been a strong advocate for campaign finance reform. He refused to accept money from PACs, federal lobbyists, or members of Congress during his 2020 campaign, and he supports limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors

Phillips' campaign finance practices and his advocacy for campaign finance reform indicate that he strongly agrees with the idea that politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections

While Phillips has not explicitly called for a ban on all political donations and publicly funded elections, his strong stance on campaign finance reform and his actions during his campaign suggest that he would likely support such measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, as long as all donations are public knowledge

Phillips has advocated for transparency in campaign finance, but his stance on limiting donations suggests that he believes transparency alone is not enough to address the issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

Phillips' stance on campaign finance reform and his refusal to accept money from certain sources during his campaign suggest that he would strongly disagree with the idea of not limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, this is a violation of free speech

Phillips' stance on campaign finance reform suggests that he would disagree with the idea that limiting donations is a violation of free speech. He has argued that the current system allows wealthy donors to have a disproportionate influence on politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 20hrs ago

Party’s support base

Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Yes

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 8,921 voters that identify as Democratic.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here