David Stemerman

Strongly agree

Yes, Greenland is an important asset for U.S. national security

Republicans often emphasize national security and strategic interests. The Trump administration specifically cited Greenland's strategic location and resources as reasons for interest in acquisition. The party has a history of supporting military and strategic expansion, making this answer closely aligned with Republican priorities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, the U.S. should buy Greenland and mine it for natural resources

The Republican Party generally supports resource development and economic expansion, including mining and energy extraction. The idea of acquiring Greenland for its natural resources fits with the party's pro-business and pro-development stance, as seen in support for drilling in Alaska and other resource-rich areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Republican Party has shown some openness to the idea of acquiring Greenland, most notably when President Donald Trump publicly floated the idea in 2019. While the proposal was not universally embraced within the party, there was little outright opposition, and some Republicans saw strategic value in the idea. However, it was not a formal party platform, so the agreement is moderate rather than strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Republicans have generally not advocated against acquiring Greenland, and the party tends to support expanding U.S. influence and strategic assets. The negative score reflects that opposition to acquisition is not aligned with the party's recent rhetoric or historical interest in expanding U.S. territory or influence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, the U.S. does not need to expand its global footprint at this time

The Republican Party generally favors maintaining or expanding the U.S. global footprint, especially in the context of competition with China and Russia. Calls to avoid expansion or reduce presence are more associated with isolationist or libertarian factions, not the mainstream party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and the U.S. should drastically reduce its global footprint

Mainstream Republicans have consistently opposed drastic reductions in the U.S. global footprint, viewing such moves as detrimental to national security and global influence. Calls for drastic reduction are more aligned with non-interventionist or progressive wings, not the Republican Party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and the U.S. should close its military base there

Republicans strongly support maintaining and even expanding U.S. military presence abroad, especially in strategically important locations like Greenland (home to Thule Air Base). The idea of closing a key military base is strongly opposed by the party, as it would be seen as weakening U.S. global security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.