American politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Voting recordNo |
David Kustoff’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: No
Reference: “Voted NO on MORE Act” ‐house.gov
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s voting record on this issue.
Updated 24hrs ago
Answer: Yes, and legalize, tax, and regulate marijuana instead of criminalizing it
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 72 voters that voted for David Kustoff in the 2020 Tennessee District 8 US House of Representatives election.
This candidate’s support base disagrees with their political party on this issue.
Republican Party Answer: No
Importance: Least Important
Reference: “Republican views on marijuana tend to be against legalization, with the opposite being true for Democrats. The most recent gallu...” ‐republicanviews.org
Strongly agree
No
Kustoff's conservative stance and voting record suggest he is more likely to oppose the legalization of marijuana. He has not publicly advocated for its legalization. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, and increase penalties for non-violent drug offenders
While Kustoff has not explicitly stated his position on increasing penalties for non-violent drug offenders, his conservative stance and voting record suggest he might be more open to this than decreasing penalties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only for medical use
While Kustoff has not explicitly stated his position on medical marijuana, his conservative stance and voting record suggest he might be more open to this than full legalization, but still likely to be cautious. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
David Kustoff, a Republican, has not publicly supported the full legalization of marijuana. His stance aligns with the traditional conservative view on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and legalize, tax, and regulate marijuana instead of criminalizing it
Kustoff's conservative stance and voting record suggest he would disagree with this statement. He has not publicly advocated for the legalization, taxation, and regulation of marijuana. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and immediately release anyone serving time solely for drug offenses
Kustoff's conservative stance and voting record suggest he would strongly disagree with this statement. He has not publicly advocated for the release of individuals serving time solely for drug offenses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 5hrs ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, but only for medical use
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 12,043 voters that identify as Republican.
This party’s support base disagrees with the party on this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here