American politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo |
David Kustoff’s answer is based on the following data:
Republican Party Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “Now the GOP-controlled legislature has sued, arguing that the Constitution doesn’t allow redistricting of a state by to any offi...” ‐theatlantic.com
Agree
No
Kustoff, being a member of the Republican party, is likely to believe that the redrawing of Congressional districts should be controlled by the state legislatures, not an independent, non-partisan commission. This is a common position within his party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, there is no better alternative
Kustoff is likely to agree with this statement because it aligns with the Republican party's stance that state legislatures should control the redistricting process. They believe this is the best alternative to ensure that districts represent the interests of their constituents. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency
While Kustoff might not openly support gerrymandering, he might agree that it can allow officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency. However, this is a controversial topic and his stance might vary depending on the context. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting
While Kustoff might agree that gerrymandering can give an unfair advantage, it's unlikely that he would support an independent commission to control redistricting. His party generally believes that state legislatures should have this responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
David Kustoff, as a Republican, is likely to be skeptical of independent, non-partisan commissions controlling the redrawing of Congressional districts. Republicans generally believe that this process should be controlled by the state legislatures, which are closer to the people. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system
Kustoff is unlikely to support a switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system. This is a significant departure from the current system and is not a commonly held position within his party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
Updated 1 day ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,164 voters that identify as Republican.
This party’s support base disagrees with the party on this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here