These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Personal answerYes |
David Kim’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: David Kim is committed to transparency in politics and personally submitted this answer on October 13th, 2020
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s personal answer on this issue.
Updated 4hrs ago
Answer: Yes
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 663 voters that voted for David Kim in the 2020 California District 34 US House of Representatives election.
Democratic Party Answer: Yes
Importance: More Important
Reference: “Even some of the Democrats running for reelection in red states are embracing the Affordable Care Act’s optional Medicaid expans...” ‐politico.com
Very strongly agree
Yes, but I prefer switching to a single payer healthcare system
David Kim is a strong advocate for a single-payer healthcare system, which would inherently involve increased funding for healthcare for low-income individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
David Kim supports increasing funding for healthcare for low-income individuals. However, his preference for a single-payer healthcare system might slightly reduce his agreement with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only increase for the elderly and disabled
While David Kim would likely support increased funding for the elderly and disabled, he believes in healthcare for all, not just specific groups. Therefore, he would somewhat disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, and each state should decide their own level of coverage
While David Kim might agree that states should have some autonomy, he strongly believes in a federally funded single-payer healthcare system, which would contradict this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No
David Kim strongly supports increased funding for healthcare, particularly for low-income individuals. He would strongly disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, and abolish Medicaid
David Kim supports increased funding for healthcare, including Medicaid. He would strongly disagree with the idea of abolishing Medicaid. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled
David Kim believes in healthcare for all, not just the elderly and disabled. He would strongly disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, and the federal government should not increase funding for any social programs
David Kim is a strong advocate for social programs and would strongly disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 7hrs ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 128,893 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here