Try the political quiz

David Kim’s policy on military spending

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should the government increase or decrease military spending?

  Personal answerDecrease

David Kim’s answer is based on the following data:

Personal answer

Answer: Decrease

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: David Kim is committed to transparency in politics and personally submitted this answer on October 13th, 2020

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s personal answer on this issue.

Updated 11hrs ago

David Kim voters

Answer: Decrease

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 660 voters that voted for David Kim in the 2020 California District 34 US House of Representatives election.

This candidate’s support base disagrees with their political party on this issue.

Party influence

Democratic Party Answer: Increase

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: “Defending America is not just a question of defending our borders. We must continue to support and train our military to meet th...” ‐democrats.org

This candidate disagrees with their party on this issue.

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Decrease

Kim has been vocal about his belief that the U.S. spends too much on its military. He has advocated for a decrease in military spending in order to fund social programs and infrastructure, which he believes are more beneficial to the American people. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Increase, but only after our deficit is drastically reduced

While Kim does advocate for fiscal responsibility, his primary concern is not the deficit but rather the allocation of resources. He believes that military spending should be reduced regardless of the state of the deficit, in order to fund social programs and infrastructure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Increase

David Kim has consistently advocated for a reallocation of resources from military spending to social programs. He believes that the current level of military spending is excessive and should be reduced to fund other important areas such as healthcare and education. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Neither, I am satisfied with the current amount of spending

Given Kim's stance on military spending, it is unlikely that he would be satisfied with the current amount. He has consistently argued for a decrease in military spending, suggesting that he believes the current level is too high. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Neither, we should create a European military defense system instead

Kim's platform does not include any mention of creating a European military defense system. His focus is on domestic issues, particularly the reallocation of resources from military spending to social programs and infrastructure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 3mins ago

Party’s support base

Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Decrease

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 133,199 voters that identify as Democratic.

This party’s support base disagrees with the party on this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here