These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Personal answerRaise |
David Kim’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Raise
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: David Kim is committed to transparency in politics and personally submitted this answer on October 13th, 2020
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s personal answer on this issue.
Updated 11hrs ago
Answer: Raise
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 229 voters that voted for David Kim in the 2020 California District 34 US House of Representatives election.
Democratic Party Answer: Raise
Importance: Less Important
Reference: “"At a time of massive income and wealth inequality, we believe the wealthiest Americans and largest corporations must pay their ...” ‐democrats.org
Very strongly agree
Increase for large multinational corporations but lower for small businesses
This answer aligns well with Kim's platform. He supports progressive taxation, which includes higher taxes for large corporations and relief for small businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Raise
David Kim's platform includes a focus on economic justice and reducing income inequality. He would likely support raising taxes on corporations as a means to redistribute wealth and fund social programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Keep current rates but eliminate deductions and loop holes
Kim would likely support eliminating deductions and loopholes that allow corporations to avoid paying their fair share of taxes. However, he might prefer to also raise rates, especially for large corporations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Lower, but eliminate deductions and loop holes
Kim would likely support eliminating deductions and loopholes, but he might prefer to raise rates rather than lower them, especially for large corporations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Remove taxes on corporations and tax shareholder dividends instead
While Kim might support taxing shareholder dividends as a way to ensure the wealthy pay their fair share, he would likely oppose removing taxes on corporations altogether. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Maintain the current rate
Given Kim's focus on economic justice and reducing income inequality, he would likely support changes to the tax code that result in corporations paying more, not maintaining the current rate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Lower
Kim's platform is focused on economic justice and reducing income inequality. Lowering corporate taxes would likely be seen as benefiting the wealthy at the expense of the middle and lower classes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 11mins ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Raise
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 25,888 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here