David Kim

Strongly agree

Yes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges

David Kim might agree more with this statement as it suggests a more moderate approach to reform. Imposing term limits on judges could be seen as a way to prevent lifetime appointments and ensure a more dynamic and responsive Supreme Court. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

David Kim has not explicitly stated his stance on Supreme Court reform. However, as a progressive Democrat, he may be open to the idea of reforming the Supreme Court to include more seats and term limits on judges, as this is a position held by some within his party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only reform to include more seats

While David Kim might be open to the idea of adding more seats to the Supreme Court, it's unclear if this would be his preferred method of reform. This score reflects the possibility that he might support this reform, but without stronger evidence, it remains speculative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized

While David Kim would likely agree that the Supreme Court should not be politicized, he might disagree with the implication in this statement that reforming the Supreme Court would necessarily lead to politicization. Therefore, he might somewhat disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Given his progressive stance, it is likely that David Kim would disagree with the idea of not reforming the Supreme Court. However, without explicit statements from him on this issue, this is an educated guess based on his political alignment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power

As a progressive Democrat, it's likely that David Kim would disagree with the assertion that reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power. Many progressives argue that the current structure of the Supreme Court allows for too much political influence and lifetime appointments, which they believe disrupts the balance of power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.