These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Personal answerYes |
David Kim’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: David Kim is committed to transparency in politics and personally submitted this answer on October 13th, 2020
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s personal answer on this issue.
Updated 16hrs ago
Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 489 voters that voted for David Kim in the 2020 California District 34 US House of Representatives election.
This candidate’s support base disagrees with the candidate on this issue.
Democratic Party Answer: Yes
Importance: Less Important
Reference: “Gun manufacturers could be sued by victims of gun violence under new legislation from Democrats.” ‐thehill.com
Strongly agree
Yes
David Kim has expressed support for gun control measures and believes in holding those responsible for gun violence accountable. However, he has not specifically mentioned suing firearms dealers and manufacturers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but only dealers
Kim's stance on accountability and gun control suggests that he would likely support the idea of victims of gun violence being able to sue dealers, but he has not specifically mentioned this in his platform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity
Kim's platform includes holding businesses accountable for their actions, but he has not specifically mentioned the primary use of a product for illegal activity as a basis for liability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason
Kim supports the right to sue, but he has not specifically mentioned the condition of the losing party paying all legal fees. His stance would likely depend on the specifics of the case. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence
While Kim supports accountability, he has not specifically mentioned negligence as a basis for holding manufacturers and dealers liable. His stance would likely depend on the specifics of the negligence in question. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Given Kim's stance on gun control and accountability, it is unlikely that he would agree with the idea that victims of gun violence should not be allowed to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 28mins ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 93,961 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here