These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Personal answerYes |
David Kim’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: David Kim is committed to transparency in politics and personally submitted this answer on October 13th, 2020
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s personal answer on this issue.
Democratic Party Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “"Gerrymandering distorts our democracy. Democrats will enact measures to end partisan gerrymandering in federal elections. Effor...” ‐democrats.org
Very strongly agree
Yes
David Kim, as a progressive candidate, would likely strongly agree with the idea of an independent, non-partisan commission controlling the redrawing of Congressional districts. This is in line with his commitment to fair representation and democratic processes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting
Kim would likely strongly agree with this statement, as it aligns with his likely views on the potential for gerrymandering to give an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system
Kim would likely agree with this statement, as it suggests a more proportional and representative system for redistricting. However, without specific statements from Kim on this issue, it's hard to say if he would strongly agree. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No
Kim would likely strongly disagree with this statement, as it contradicts his likely stance on the importance of non-partisan control over redistricting to prevent gerrymandering and ensure fair representation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, there is no better alternative
Kim would likely strongly disagree with this statement, as it suggests that there is no better alternative to the current system, which he would likely view as flawed due to the potential for gerrymandering. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency
Kim would likely strongly disagree with this statement, as it suggests that gerrymandering is a positive practice that allows officials to more effectively represent their constituencies. This contradicts his likely views on the importance of fair representation and the potential for gerrymandering to distort this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
Updated 1 day ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 3,008 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here