David Faust

Agree

Yes

The Democratic Party generally supports transparency and clarity in the legislative process, which aligns with the principle that each constitutional amendment should address only one topic. This 'single subject rule' is intended to prevent 'logrolling' (combining unrelated issues to pass controversial measures) and to ensure voters understand what they are voting on. Nationally, Democrats have supported similar measures in various states, such as California and Florida, to promote good governance and prevent confusion. However, Democrats have sometimes opposed overly restrictive interpretations of the rule if it is used to block progressive reforms or citizen initiatives, which tempers their support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The Democratic Party would generally disagree with allowing constitutional amendments to address multiple topics, as this can lead to voter confusion and the passage of measures that might not succeed on their own merits. Historically, Democrats have criticized 'omnibus' bills and amendments for lacking transparency. However, they may oppose the single subject rule if it is used as a tool to suppress citizen-led initiatives or progressive reforms, which is why the disagreement is not absolute. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.