These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo, incentivize private companies to address this issue instead |
Dave Giles’ answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, incentivize private companies to address this issue instead
Dave Giles is a proponent of free-market solutions and has advocated for reducing government intervention in the healthcare sector. Therefore, he would likely agree with incentivizing private companies to address mental health issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Given Giles' conservative stance and his support for limited government spending, it is likely that he would agree with not increasing government funding for mental health research and treatment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but only increase funding for personalized care instead of subsidizing pharmaceutical companies
While Giles might agree with the idea of personalized care, he is generally against increasing government spending. Therefore, he might somewhat agree with this statement, but would likely prefer a solution that does not involve increased government funding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Dave Giles, as a conservative Republican, generally supports limited government intervention and spending. He has not specifically addressed mental health funding, but his overall political stance suggests he would not support a broad increase in government funding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, our mental healthcare system needs more funding to provide a higher quality of care and services
This answer implies a significant increase in government spending and intervention in the healthcare sector, which is generally not aligned with Giles' political stance. Therefore, it is likely that he would disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 23mins ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, but only increase funding for personalized care instead of subsidizing pharmaceutical companies
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 14,602 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here