These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo |
Dave Giles’ answer is based on the following data:
Republican Party Answer: No, and abolish the federal income tax
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “We condemn attempts by activist judges at any level of government to seize the power of the purse from the people’s elected repr...” ‐gop.com
Very strongly agree
No
Giles' platform aligns with the Republican party's stance on taxes, which typically opposes tax increases, particularly for the wealthy. He believes in stimulating economic growth through lower taxes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Reform to a flat tax
Giles has expressed support for tax reform, and a flat tax is a common proposal among Republicans. However, he has not specifically advocated for a flat tax. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, keep the current tax structure
While Giles might support some changes to the current tax structure, he is generally in favor of maintaining or reducing current tax levels rather than increasing them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Lower the income tax rate and remove all existing tax loopholes for large corporations
Giles has expressed support for tax reform and reducing government intervention, which could potentially include removing tax loopholes for large corporations. However, he has not specifically advocated for this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but lower taxes for the poor
While Giles has not specifically advocated for lowering taxes for the poor, his general stance on lower taxes could potentially align with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Abolish the income tax, disallow all deductions and increase the sales tax
While Giles has not specifically advocated for this approach, his general stance on tax reform and reducing government intervention could potentially align with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Dave Giles, as a Republican candidate, generally supports lower taxes and less government intervention in the economy. He has not publicly advocated for raising taxes on the rich. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and raise taxes on all income brackets
Giles is unlikely to support raising taxes on all income brackets. His campaign has focused on reducing taxes and government spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
Updated 19mins ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 160,099 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here