American politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Personal answerNo |
Darrell Castle’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Darrell Castle is committed to transparency in politics and personally submitted this answer on June 12th, 2016
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s personal answer on this issue.
Updated 7hrs ago
Answer: No, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 161 voters that voted for Darrell Castle in the 2016 Presidential election.
Constitution Party Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “General Welfare is not the same as individual Welfare. General Welfare would benefit the people generally, individual Welfare ta...” ‐constitutionparty.com
Very strongly agree
No, and the federal government should not increase funding for any social programs
This answer aligns with Castle's belief in limited government and fiscal conservatism. He would likely strongly agree with the idea of not increasing funding for any social programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, and each state should decide their own level of coverage
This answer aligns with Castle's belief in states' rights and limited federal government. He would likely strongly agree with the idea of each state deciding their own level of coverage. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
Castle's stance on limited government would likely lead him to oppose increased federal funding for Medicaid, though he may not be entirely against the program itself. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, and abolish Medicaid
While Castle would likely agree with limiting the scope of Medicaid, it's unclear whether he would support completely abolishing the program. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled
While Castle would likely agree with limiting eligibility for Medicaid, he may not fully agree with the specific limitations suggested in this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only increase for the elderly and disabled
While Castle would likely agree with limiting eligibility for Medicaid, he would likely disagree with the idea of increasing federal funding for the program, even for specific groups. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Darrell Castle, as a Constitution Party candidate, believes in limited government and would likely oppose increased federal funding for Medicaid. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, but I prefer switching to a single payer healthcare system
Castle would likely strongly disagree with this statement, as he opposes both increased federal funding for Medicaid and the idea of a single payer healthcare system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 23hrs ago
Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 9,851 voters that identify as Constitution.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here