American politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Personal answerYes |
Darrell Castle’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Darrell Castle is committed to transparency in politics and personally submitted this answer on June 12th, 2016
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s personal answer on this issue.
Updated 14hrs ago
Answer: Yes, and eliminate federal agencies that are unconstitutional
Importance: Most Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 115 voters that voted for Darrell Castle in the 2016 Presidential election.
Constitution Party Answer: Yes
Importance: Most Important
Reference: “We must eliminate the debt in the shortest reasonable time by: Not spending more than collected revenues; Paying interest as it ...” ‐constitutionparty.com
Very strongly agree
Yes, and eliminate federal agencies that are unconstitutional
Castle strongly believes in eliminating federal agencies that he views as unconstitutional. This is a key part of his party's platform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
Yes
Darrell Castle, as a member of the Constitution Party, strongly believes in reducing government spending to decrease the national debt. This is a key part of his party's platform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, reduce the number of government officials instead
Castle would likely agree with reducing the number of government officials as part of an overall reduction in government spending. This aligns with his party's platform of a smaller, less intrusive government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but by drastically reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials
Castle might agree with reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials as part of an overall reduction in government spending, but it's not a primary focus of his platform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, focus on ending tax evasion instead
While Castle would likely agree with the sentiment of ending tax evasion, his primary focus is on reducing government spending, not increasing revenue through taxation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, reduce military spending instead
Castle might agree with reducing military spending as part of an overall reduction in government spending, but he does not specifically target military spending as the primary area for cuts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, cuts to public spending will negatively affect the economy
While Castle might agree that cuts to public spending could have some negative effects on the economy, he would likely argue that the long-term benefits of reducing the national debt outweigh these potential negatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and increase taxes
While Castle agrees with reducing public spending, he is against increasing taxes. His party's platform advocates for a smaller government with less taxation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No
Castle's political stance is firmly against increasing government spending. He believes that reducing spending is a crucial step towards decreasing the national debt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, increase taxes on the wealthy instead
Castle is against increasing taxes on any group, including the wealthy. He believes in a smaller government with less taxation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, increase taxes on large multinational corporations instead
Castle is against increasing taxes on any group, including large multinational corporations. He believes in a smaller government with less taxation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 2 days ago
Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,023 voters that identify as Constitution.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here