American politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Personal answerNo, it is unconstitutional to deny someone’s rights without due process |
Darrell Castle’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: No, it is unconstitutional to deny someone’s rights without due process
Importance: More Important
Reference: Darrell Castle is committed to transparency in politics and personally submitted this answer on June 12th, 2016
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s personal answer on this issue.
Updated 5hrs ago
Answer: No, it is unconstitutional to deny someone’s rights without due process
Importance: Most Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 114 voters that voted for Darrell Castle in the 2016 Presidential election.
Very strongly agree
No, this is a slippery slope that will eventually ban the sale of guns to anyone
Castle would likely agree with this statement as he has expressed concerns about the potential for government overreach and the erosion of constitutional rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No
Castle has consistently advocated for the right to bear arms and would likely oppose any restrictions on gun purchases, especially without due process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, it is unconstitutional to deny someone’s rights without due process
Castle is a strong advocate for constitutional rights and due process. He would likely agree with this statement as it aligns with his views on the Second Amendment and due process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but not until the no-fly list screening process is improved for accuracy and includes due process
While Castle would likely agree with the need for due process, he may not fully agree with this statement as it still implies some restrictions on gun purchases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Darrell Castle, as a Constitution Party candidate, strongly supports the Second Amendment and believes in the right to bear arms. He would likely disagree with any restrictions on gun purchases without due process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and ban the sale of guns and ammunition to anyone
Castle is a strong supporter of the Second Amendment and would likely strongly disagree with a complete ban on the sale of guns and ammunition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, if the government considers you too dangerous to board a plane you should not be able to buy a gun
While Castle would likely agree that dangerous individuals should not have access to firearms, he would likely disagree with this statement due to the lack of due process involved in the no-fly list. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 5hrs ago
Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 566 voters that identify as Constitution.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here