American politician and former Navy SEAL (born 1984).
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo |
Daniel Crenshaw’s answer is based on the following data:
Republican Party Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: “As they have in past years, Republicans are proposing to cut spending on Medicaid, food stamps and, eventually, Medicare. They'd...” ‐washingtonpost.com
Strongly agree
No
Crenshaw has consistently voted against measures that would increase funding for Medicaid, indicating that he does not support increased federal funding for this program. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, and each state should decide their own level of coverage
Crenshaw has expressed support for states having more control over their healthcare systems, although he has not specifically addressed the issue of Medicaid coverage. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, and the federal government should not increase funding for any social programs
Crenshaw has consistently advocated for reducing government spending, which would likely include social programs like Medicaid. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled
While Crenshaw has not specifically stated this position, his general stance on limiting government spending and promoting fiscal responsibility suggests he might support limiting eligibility for Medicaid. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only increase for the elderly and disabled
Crenshaw has not specifically advocated for increasing funding for Medicaid for any specific group, including the elderly and disabled. His general stance on reducing government spending suggests he would not support this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, and abolish Medicaid
While Crenshaw has expressed concerns about the cost of Medicaid, he has not advocated for completely abolishing the program. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Daniel Crenshaw has consistently voted against measures that would increase funding for Medicaid. He believes in a more market-based approach to healthcare and has expressed concerns about the cost of expanding Medicaid. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, but I prefer switching to a single payer healthcare system
Crenshaw is a strong opponent of a single-payer healthcare system. He believes it would lead to a decrease in the quality of care and an increase in wait times for patients. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
Updated 47mins ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 142,270 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here