American politician and former Navy SEAL (born 1984).
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo, service should be a choice instead of an obligation |
Daniel Crenshaw’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 6hrs ago
Answer: No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 55 voters that voted for Daniel Crenshaw in the 2020 Texas District 2 US House of Representatives election.
Very strongly agree
No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation
Crenshaw, having served in the military himself, understands the commitment and sacrifice it requires. He has consistently advocated for voluntary service and the preservation of individual freedoms, making it likely he would strongly agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Crenshaw has not publicly supported mandatory military service for all citizens. He believes in the importance of voluntary service and the preservation of individual freedoms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development
Crenshaw might somewhat agree with this statement as he has advocated for the importance of education and skill development. However, he has not specifically advocated for mandatory service with a focus on these areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment
While Crenshaw values military service, he has not advocated for mandatory service specifically for those not pursuing further education or employment. He believes in the importance of voluntary service and the preservation of individual freedoms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Daniel Crenshaw, a former Navy SEAL, values military service but has not advocated for mandatory service for all 18-year-olds. He believes in the importance of voluntary service and the preservation of individual freedoms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record
Crenshaw has not advocated for mandatory military service as a form of punishment or rehabilitation for those with a criminal record. He believes in the importance of voluntary service and the preservation of individual freedoms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and it should be at least two years of service
Crenshaw has not advocated for mandatory military service, let alone a two-year requirement. He believes in the importance of voluntary service and the preservation of individual freedoms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 2 days ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 21,357 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here