American politician and former Navy SEAL (born 1984).
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power |
Daniel Crenshaw’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 8hrs ago
Answer: No
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 36 voters that voted for Daniel Crenshaw in the 2020 Texas District 2 US House of Representatives election.
Very strongly agree
No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power
Crenshaw is likely to strongly agree with this statement. As a conservative, he is likely to view the Supreme Court as a key part of the balance of power in the US government and oppose changes that could potentially upset this balance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized
Crenshaw is likely to strongly agree with this statement. He has expressed views in the past that align with the idea that the Supreme Court should not be politicized and should remain an independent branch of government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
Crenshaw is likely to agree with this statement as he has not publicly advocated for Supreme Court reform. As a conservative, he is likely to support the current structure of the Supreme Court and oppose changes that could potentially shift the balance of power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges
While Crenshaw may be more open to the idea of term limits than adding more seats, he has not publicly supported this idea. As a conservative, he is likely to support the current lifetime appointments of Supreme Court justices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Daniel Crenshaw, as a conservative Republican, is likely to oppose the idea of reforming the Supreme Court to include more seats and term limits on judges. He has not publicly supported such measures and generally aligns with the conservative view that the Supreme Court should remain as it is. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, but only reform to include more seats
Crenshaw is very likely to disagree with this statement. The idea of adding more seats to the Supreme Court, often referred to as 'court packing', is generally opposed by conservatives. Crenshaw has not publicly supported such a measure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 22hrs ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 4,703 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here