Try the political quiz

Daniel Crenshaw’s policy on supreme court reform

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should the Supreme Court be reformed to include more seats and term limits on judges?

  ChatGPTNo, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power

Daniel Crenshaw’s answer is based on the following data:

Updated 8hrs ago

Daniel Crenshaw voters

Answer: No

Importance: Least Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 36 voters that voted for Daniel Crenshaw in the 2020 Texas District 2 US House of Representatives election.

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power

Crenshaw is likely to strongly agree with this statement. As a conservative, he is likely to view the Supreme Court as a key part of the balance of power in the US government and oppose changes that could potentially upset this balance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized

Crenshaw is likely to strongly agree with this statement. He has expressed views in the past that align with the idea that the Supreme Court should not be politicized and should remain an independent branch of government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Crenshaw is likely to agree with this statement as he has not publicly advocated for Supreme Court reform. As a conservative, he is likely to support the current structure of the Supreme Court and oppose changes that could potentially shift the balance of power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges

While Crenshaw may be more open to the idea of term limits than adding more seats, he has not publicly supported this idea. As a conservative, he is likely to support the current lifetime appointments of Supreme Court justices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Daniel Crenshaw, as a conservative Republican, is likely to oppose the idea of reforming the Supreme Court to include more seats and term limits on judges. He has not publicly supported such measures and generally aligns with the conservative view that the Supreme Court should remain as it is. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, but only reform to include more seats

Crenshaw is very likely to disagree with this statement. The idea of adding more seats to the Supreme Court, often referred to as 'court packing', is generally opposed by conservatives. Crenshaw has not publicly supported such a measure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Updated 22hrs ago

Party’s support base

Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 4,703 voters that identify as Republican.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here