These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTYes |
Dana Cottrell’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 12hrs ago
Answer: Yes
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 15 voters that voted for Dana Cottrell in the 2020 Florida District 11 US House of Representatives election.
Strongly agree
Yes
As a Democratic candidate, Dana Cottrell is likely to support reforms to the Supreme Court, including adding more seats and imposing term limits on judges. This is a position that has been increasingly popular among Democrats, particularly in response to the recent appointments of conservative judges. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges
Cottrell would likely support term limits on judges as a way to prevent the court from becoming overly influenced by any one political ideology. This is a common position among Democrats, who argue that lifetime appointments can lead to a lack of diversity and representation on the court. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only reform to include more seats
While Cottrell might support adding more seats to the Supreme Court, it's not as clear-cut as the issue of term limits. Expanding the court has been a more controversial proposal, even among Democrats, due to concerns about court packing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized
While Cottrell would likely agree that the Supreme Court should not be politicized, she might disagree with the implication that reforms would necessarily lead to further politicization. Many Democrats argue that reforms are necessary to depoliticize the court and restore its role as an impartial arbiter of the law. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Given her political affiliation, it is unlikely that Cottrell would oppose reforms to the Supreme Court. Many Democrats believe that the court has become overly politicized and that reforms are necessary to restore balance and fairness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power
Cottrell, as a Democrat, would likely disagree with the assertion that reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional or would upset the balance of power. Many Democrats argue that the current composition of the court is already unbalanced due to the recent appointments of conservative judges. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 56mins ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 5,028 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here