Try the political quiz

Dana Balter’s policy on supreme court reform

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should the Supreme Court be reformed to include more seats and term limits on judges?

  ChatGPTYes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges

Dana Balter’s answer is based on the following data:

Updated 18hrs ago

Dana Balter voters

Answer: Yes

Importance: Least Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 17 voters that voted for Dana Balter in the 2020 New York District 24 US House of Representatives election.

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges

While Balter has not explicitly stated her position on Supreme Court reform, the idea of imposing term limits on judges is generally more palatable and less controversial than adding more seats. As such, it is likely that Balter would agree with this reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Dana Balter, a Democrat, has not explicitly stated her position on Supreme Court reform. However, many Democrats have expressed support for such reforms, including adding more seats and imposing term limits. Balter's progressive platform suggests she might be open to these changes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only reform to include more seats

While some Democrats have advocated for adding more seats to the Supreme Court, this is a more controversial reform that has been criticized as court-packing. Balter might be open to this idea, but it's less clear than her likely support for term limits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized

While Balter would likely agree that the Supreme Court should not be politicized, she would likely disagree with the implication that reform efforts are inherently politicizing. Many Democrats argue that the court has already been politicized and that reform is necessary to restore its impartiality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Given her progressive stance and alignment with the Democratic party, it is likely that Balter would disagree with maintaining the status quo of the Supreme Court, especially in light of recent controversies surrounding the court's composition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power

Balter, as a progressive Democrat, would likely disagree with the assertion that reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power. Many Democrats argue that the current composition of the court is already unbalanced and that reform is necessary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Updated 46mins ago

Party’s support base

Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Yes

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 5,034 voters that identify as Democratic.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here