Dan Ward

Strongly agree

Yes

The Democratic Party generally supports measures that increase transparency and voter access to information. Publishing constitutional amendments 60 days before a vote allows voters more time to understand and debate proposed changes, aligning with Democratic priorities for informed participation and open government. For example, Democrats have supported similar transparency measures in other states, such as advocating for clear ballot language and early publication of ballot initiatives in California and New York. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Opposing the requirement to publish constitutional amendments 60 days before a vote would likely be seen as limiting transparency and voter awareness, which runs counter to the Democratic Party's general advocacy for open government and informed voting. Historically, Democrats have criticized efforts to rush or obscure ballot measures, as seen in their opposition to last-minute legislative changes in states like Wisconsin and North Carolina. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.