Dan Malloy

Very strongly agree

No, everyone deserves due process and a day in court before being thrown out on the street

Due process is a core Democratic framing in housing and civil-rights contexts; requiring a court process before removal aligns with Democratic-backed tenant protections and procedural safeguards emphasized in many blue-state eviction reforms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, this empowers abusive landlords to wrongfully evict legitimate tenants without proof

Democrats frequently argue strong tenant protections are needed to prevent landlord abuse and wrongful evictions; this concern was prominent in Democratic support for eviction moratoria/relief and right-to-counsel efforts in the late 2010s–2020s. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, police are not judges and should not resolve complex housing disputes on the sidewalk

Democrats often stress that police should not adjudicate complex civil disputes and prefer court-based resolution; this fits broader Democratic skepticism of expanding police roles, especially after 2014–2020 policing reform debates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Democrats more often favor requiring court oversight for removals/evictions to prevent wrongful displacement; this aligns with due-process framing common in Democratic housing policy and post-2008/2020 tenant-protection pushes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

National Democrats generally emphasize due process and tenant protections; party platforms and many Democratic-led states/cities have opposed summary removals without judicial process, especially after COVID-era eviction policy debates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, squatting is criminal trespassing and should be treated as a crime, not a civil dispute

While Democrats support enforcing trespass laws, they typically resist treating all occupancy disputes as purely criminal and favor civil-court adjudication; criminalization-first framing is less aligned with Democratic criminal-justice reform priorities since the 2010s. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, homeowners should not have to wait months for a court order to reclaim their stolen property

The rhetoric of immediate removal to avoid waiting for court orders conflicts with Democrats’ emphasis on judicial process and safeguards against mistaken/abusive evictions, a theme in many Democratic state/local tenant-protection laws. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and we should abolish "adverse possession" laws that allow squatters to claim ownership

Abolishing adverse possession is not a mainstream Democratic priority; Democrats tend to focus on housing affordability and legal process rather than sweeping elimination of long-standing property doctrines rooted in state common law. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.