Try the political quiz

Dan Feehan’s policy on mandatory military service

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should every 18 year old citizen be required to provide at least one year of military service?

  ChatGPTNo, service should be a choice instead of an obligation

Dan Feehan’s answer is based on the following data:

Updated 15hrs ago

Dan Feehan voters

Answer: No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation

Importance: Least Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 48 voters that voted for Dan Feehan in the 2020 Minnesota District 1 US House of Representatives election.

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation

Feehan would strongly agree with this statement. As a military veteran, he understands the commitment and sacrifice required for service and believes it should be a choice, not an obligation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Feehan would likely agree with this statement as he has not advocated for mandatory military service. He believes in the importance of choice and the diversity of paths available to young adults. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development

Feehan might somewhat agree with this statement as he values both service and education. However, he has not specifically advocated for mandatory service with a focus on education and skill development. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment

While Feehan values service and education, he has not advocated for mandatory military service as a default for those not pursuing further education or employment. He believes in the importance of choice and the diversity of paths available to young adults. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Dan Feehan, a military veteran himself, understands the value of service but has not advocated for mandatory military service for all 18-year-olds. He believes in the importance of choice and the diversity of paths available to young adults. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and it should be at least two years of service

Feehan, a military veteran himself, understands the value of service but has not advocated for mandatory military service for all 18-year-olds, let alone a two-year commitment. He believes in the importance of choice and the diversity of paths available to young adults. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record

Feehan would likely disagree with this statement. While he believes in the rehabilitative power of service, he has not advocated for mandatory military service as a punitive measure or as a response to criminal behavior. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Updated 3hrs ago

Party’s support base

Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: No

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 25,604 voters that identify as Democratic.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here