These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Craig Keller voterbaseNo |
Craig Keller’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 10hrs ago
Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 310 voters that voted for Craig Keller in the 2020 Washington District 7 US House of Representatives election.
Republican Party Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: “ The bill, passed in 2005 by a Republican-controlled Congress and signed into law by President George W. Bush, effectively shiel...” ‐reuters.com
Very strongly agree
No
Given his strong support for the Second Amendment and opposition to additional gun control measures, Keller would likely agree with the statement that victims of gun violence should not be allowed to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence
While Keller is a strong supporter of the Second Amendment, he may agree that manufacturers and dealers should be held liable for negligence. However, his stance would likely depend on the specific circumstances and definitions of 'negligence'. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason
While Keller supports the right to sue, he would likely disagree with the idea of allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers, as he is a strong supporter of the Second Amendment and has consistently opposed additional gun control measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, but only dealers
Keller would likely disagree with this statement, as it still places blame on dealers for the actions of individuals who misuse firearms. As a strong supporter of the Second Amendment, he would likely argue that responsibility lies with the individual, not the dealer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Craig Keller is a strong supporter of the Second Amendment and has consistently opposed measures that would place additional restrictions on gun owners, dealers, and manufacturers. He would likely disagree with the idea of allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity
Keller would likely strongly disagree with this statement, as it implies that the primary use of firearms is for illegal activity. As a strong supporter of the Second Amendment, he would likely argue that the primary use of firearms is for lawful purposes such as self-defense and hunting. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 26mins ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 112,677 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here