These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices |
Craig Cameron’s answer is based on the following data:
Republican Party Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “"One of the most interesting aspects of this argument is the nature in which Republican views on Net Neutrality are divided. In ...” ‐republicanviews.org
Very strongly agree
No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
Cameron agrees with this statement as he has expressed concerns about the potential for internet service providers to manipulate access and pricing if they are allowed to prioritize certain websites. He believes this could stifle competition and lead to higher prices for consumers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No
Cameron's stance on net neutrality aligns with this answer. He believes that all internet traffic should be treated equally, without favoring certain websites or services based on their ability to pay higher rates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
This answer aligns perfectly with Cameron's stance on net neutrality. He has consistently advocated for treating all internet traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)
While this answer suggests a compromise, Cameron's stance on net neutrality is clear: all internet traffic should be treated equally, regardless of its type or source. He would likely disagree with any form of prioritization. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Craig Cameron has consistently advocated for net neutrality, which opposes the idea of internet service providers speeding up access to certain websites over others. He believes in equal access to all websites, regardless of their popularity or the rates they pay. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model
Cameron's support for net neutrality suggests that he would disagree with this answer. He believes that all internet traffic should be treated equally, regardless of how much a website is willing or able to pay. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users
While Cameron acknowledges the need for a fast and reliable internet, he does not support the idea of achieving this by prioritizing certain websites over others. He believes this would undermine the principle of net neutrality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
Updated 14hrs ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 16,610 voters that identify as Republican.
This party’s support base disagrees with the party on this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here