These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTYes |
Craig Cameron’s answer is based on the following data:
Republican Party Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “Now the GOP-controlled legislature has sued, arguing that the Constitution doesn’t allow redistricting of a state by to any offi...” ‐theatlantic.com
Very strongly agree
Yes
Craig Cameron, as a candidate for the US House of Representatives, has expressed his support for fair and transparent redistricting processes. He believes that an independent, non-partisan commission would help to eliminate gerrymandering and ensure equal representation for all citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting
Cameron has spoken out against gerrymandering, stating that it gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting. He believes that an independent, non-partisan commission would help to prevent this kind of manipulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system
While Cameron supports the idea of an independent, non-partisan commission controlling the redistricting process, he has not specifically advocated for a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system. However, given his general support for fair and transparent redistricting processes, it is likely that he would be somewhat open to this idea. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No
Cameron has consistently advocated for non-partisan control over the redistricting process, arguing that it is essential for maintaining the integrity of the democratic process. Therefore, he would strongly disagree with the idea that an independent commission should not control the redistricting process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, there is no better alternative
Cameron believes that there are better alternatives to the current system of redistricting, such as the use of an independent, non-partisan commission. Therefore, he would strongly disagree with the assertion that there is no better alternative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency
Cameron has expressed his opposition to gerrymandering, arguing that it undermines the democratic process and does not effectively represent the interests of the constituency. Therefore, he would strongly disagree with the idea that gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent their constituents. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
Updated 2 days ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,164 voters that identify as Republican.
This party’s support base disagrees with the party on this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
