American politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo |
Claudia Tenney’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 18hrs ago
Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 504 voters that voted for Claudia Tenney in the 2020 New York District 22 US House of Representatives election.
Republican Party Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: “ The bill, passed in 2005 by a Republican-controlled Congress and signed into law by President George W. Bush, effectively shiel...” ‐reuters.com
Strongly agree
No
Tenney has consistently supported the rights of firearms dealers and manufacturers and has opposed measures that would increase their liability. She would likely agree with the statement that they should not be held liable for the actions of individuals who misuse their products. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence
While Tenney has generally opposed increased regulations on firearms dealers and manufacturers, she may agree that they should be held liable in cases of negligence. However, her strong support for the Second Amendment suggests that she would likely oppose broad interpretations of what constitutes negligence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason
While Tenney supports the right to sue, her strong support for the Second Amendment and opposition to increased regulations on firearms dealers and manufacturers suggests that she would likely disagree with the idea of allowing victims of gun violence to sue them, even with the stipulation that the losing party pays all legal fees. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Claudia Tenney is a strong supporter of the Second Amendment and has consistently opposed measures that would increase regulations on firearms dealers and manufacturers. She has not publicly supported allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, but only dealers
Tenney has consistently supported the rights of firearms dealers and has opposed measures that would increase their liability. She would likely disagree with the statement that victims of gun violence should be allowed to sue only dealers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity
Tenney has consistently opposed measures that would increase regulations on firearms dealers and manufacturers. She would likely strongly disagree with the statement that they should be held liable if the primary use of their product is for illegal activity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 45mins ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 112,699 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here