U.S. Representative from Iowa.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTYes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors |
Cindy Axne’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 11hrs ago
Answer: Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 31 voters that voted for Cindy Axne in the 2022 Iowa District 3 US House of Representatives election.
Democratic Party Answer: Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors
Importance: Least Important
Reference: “Democrats denounced it as an assault on democracy and a sop to billionaires when the Supreme Court issued a ruling two years ago...” ‐nytimes.com
Very strongly agree
Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors
Axne has expressed concern about the influence of money in politics, and she has pledged not to accept corporate PAC money. This suggests she would strongly agree with the idea that politicians should not be 'bought' by wealthy donors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
Cindy Axne, as a Democrat, is likely to support campaign finance reform, which includes limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor. However, there is no specific record of her advocating for this particular policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections
While Axne may support the idea of publicly funded elections, there is no specific record of her advocating for a complete ban on all political donations. Therefore, she might agree with this statement to some extent, but not strongly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, as long as all donations are public knowledge
Axne might agree with the idea of making all donations public knowledge, as it aligns with the Democratic party's push for transparency in campaign financing. However, this does not necessarily mean she would oppose limits on donation amounts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Given her party's stance on campaign finance reform, it is unlikely that Axne would support unlimited donations from a single donor. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, this is a violation of free speech
Axne is unlikely to view campaign finance limits as a violation of free speech, given her party's general stance on the issue and her own commitment to reducing the influence of money in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 2 days ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 8,986 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here