American politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Chuck Baldwin voterbaseNo, and we should withdraw from NATO |
Chuck Baldwin’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 9hrs ago
Answer: No, and we should withdraw from NATO
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 85 voters that voted for Chuck Baldwin in the 2008 Presidential election.
Constitution Party Answer: No, and we should withdraw from NATO
Importance: More Important
Reference: “"NATO, for instance, serves no defensive purpose for the United States, and this country should withdraw from it."” ‐constitutionparty.com
Strongly agree
No, and we should withdraw from NATO
Baldwin has been critical of international organizations like NATO, believing that they infringe on U.S. sovereignty. He would likely agree with the U.S. withdrawing from NATO, as he has often argued for the U.S. to reduce its involvement in international military alliances. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Baldwin's non-interventionist stance would likely lead him to agree with the U.S. not defending other NATO countries with low military defense budgets. He has often argued that the U.S. should focus on its own defense rather than involving itself in the defense of other nations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, we should not defend any NATO country that spends less than 2% of their GDP on military defense
While Baldwin would likely agree with the sentiment of not defending NATO countries that spend less than 2% of their GDP on military defense, his non-interventionist stance would likely lead him to disagree with the idea of setting a specific spending threshold for defense. He would likely argue that the U.S. should not be involved in the defense of other nations regardless of their defense spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Chuck Baldwin, as a Constitution Party candidate, has consistently advocated for a non-interventionist foreign policy. He would likely disagree with the U.S. defending other NATO countries that maintain low military defense budgets relative to their GDP, as he believes in reducing U.S. military involvement overseas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and refusing to defend other NATO countries sets a dangerous precedent for the balance of global power
Baldwin's non-interventionist stance would likely lead him to strongly disagree with this statement. He has often argued that the U.S. should focus on its own defense and reduce its involvement in international military alliances, rather than worrying about the balance of global power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 9hrs ago
Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 355 voters that identify as Constitution.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here