American politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Chuck Baldwin voterbaseNo, not until we decrease our national debt |
Chuck Baldwin’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 17hrs ago
Answer: No, not until we decrease our national debt
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 72 voters that voted for Chuck Baldwin in the 2008 Presidential election.
Constitution Party Answer: No, they should be reduced
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “We seek to abolish Congressional pensions and other benefits that extend beyond their term in office, and favor a conflict-of-in...” ‐constitutionparty.com
Strongly agree
No, not until we decrease our national debt
Baldwin has expressed concern about the national debt and would likely prioritize reducing it over increasing pension payments. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Baldwin's stance on fiscal conservatism suggests he would be cautious about increasing government spending, including on pensions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, they should be reduced
While Baldwin is fiscally conservative, there's no specific evidence to suggest he would advocate for reducing pension payments. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, but only for low-income pensioners
Baldwin's views on this specific issue are not clear. While he might support assistance for low-income individuals, he also advocates for fiscal conservatism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, for government workers but not for politicians
Baldwin's views on this specific issue are not clear. He might support this distinction between government workers and politicians, but there's no specific evidence to suggest so. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, adjust them yearly for cost of living
Baldwin's fiscal conservatism suggests he would be cautious about any measures that could increase government spending, including adjusting pensions for cost of living. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Chuck Baldwin, as a Constitution Party candidate, generally supports limited government and fiscal conservatism. He would likely be hesitant to increase pension payments without considering the financial implications. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 17hrs ago
Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 100 voters that identify as Constitution.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here