American politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Chuck Baldwin voterbaseNo, and pass strict laws prohibiting government surveillance without probable cause and a warrant |
Chuck Baldwin’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 4hrs ago
Answer: No, and pass strict laws prohibiting government surveillance without probable cause and a warrant
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 86 voters that voted for Chuck Baldwin in the 2008 Presidential election.
Constitution Party Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: “We deplore and vigorously oppose legislation and executive action that deprive the people of their rights secured under the Four...” ‐constitutionparty.com
Very strongly agree
No
Baldwin has been a vocal critic of the Patriot Act, arguing that it oversteps constitutional boundaries and infringes on individual rights. He would strongly agree with the outright rejection of the Act. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, and pass strict laws prohibiting government surveillance without probable cause and a warrant
Baldwin's stance on the Patriot Act aligns with this answer. He has consistently advocated for strict laws prohibiting government surveillance without probable cause and a warrant, arguing that such measures are necessary to protect individual rights and liberties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but the sections involving surveillance and criminalization are too broad
While Baldwin would agree that sections of the Patriot Act involving surveillance and criminalization are too broad, he opposes the Act as a whole, not just these sections. Therefore, he would likely disagree with this answer, but not as strongly as with outright support of the Act. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but limit the scope of the government’s powers
While Baldwin might agree with limiting the scope of government powers, he has been clear in his opposition to the Patriot Act in its entirety, not just certain aspects of it. Therefore, he would likely disagree with this answer, but not as strongly as with outright support of the Act. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Chuck Baldwin, as a Constitution Party candidate, has consistently opposed the Patriot Act. He believes it infringes on civil liberties and violates the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 4hrs ago
Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: No, and pass strict laws prohibiting government surveillance without probable cause and a warrant
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 540 voters that identify as Constitution.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here