American politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Chuck Baldwin voterbaseNo, it is unconstitutional to deny someone’s rights without due process |
Chuck Baldwin’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 4hrs ago
Answer: No, it is unconstitutional to deny someone’s rights without due process
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 88 voters that voted for Chuck Baldwin in the 2008 Presidential election.
Very strongly agree
No, this is a slippery slope that will eventually ban the sale of guns to anyone
Baldwin would likely agree with this statement, as he has expressed concerns about the potential for government overreach and the erosion of constitutional rights, including the right to bear arms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No
Baldwin's strong support for the Second Amendment would likely lead him to agree with this statement. He has consistently opposed measures that restrict gun ownership. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, it is unconstitutional to deny someone’s rights without due process
Baldwin would likely strongly agree with this statement. He is a strong advocate for due process and constitutional rights, including the right to bear arms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but not until the no-fly list screening process is improved for accuracy and includes due process
While Baldwin might agree with the need for improved accuracy and due process in the no-fly list screening process, he would likely still disagree with the idea of using this list to restrict gun purchases, given his strong support for the Second Amendment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Chuck Baldwin, as a Constitution Party candidate, strongly supports the Second Amendment and the right to bear arms. He would likely disagree with any measure that restricts this right, including banning people on the no-fly list from purchasing guns and ammunition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and ban the sale of guns and ammunition to anyone
Baldwin would strongly disagree with this statement. He is a staunch supporter of the Second Amendment and would oppose any measures to ban the sale of guns and ammunition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, if the government considers you too dangerous to board a plane you should not be able to buy a gun
Baldwin would likely disagree with this statement. While he may agree that those deemed dangerous should not have access to firearms, he would likely argue that the no-fly list is not a reliable or fair measure of who is dangerous. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 1 day ago
Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 571 voters that identify as Constitution.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here