American politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Chuck Baldwin voterbaseYes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users |
Chuck Baldwin’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 9hrs ago
Answer: Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 80 voters that voted for Chuck Baldwin in the 2008 Presidential election.
Constitution Party Answer: Yes
Importance: Less Important
Reference: “"With the lame ducks out of the way, what else can Congress be proud of? Here’s just a few... Net neutrality talks well under wa...” ‐constitutionparty.com
Strongly agree
No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
Baldwin would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with his views on the importance of competition and the potential dangers of monopolistic practices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
Baldwin would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with his views on the importance of fairness and competition. He would likely see the equal treatment of all internet traffic as a way to ensure these principles are upheld. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Baldwin would likely agree with this statement to some extent, as he would likely see the potential for ISPs to manipulate access as a threat to fair competition and consumer choice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)
While Baldwin might see some merit in prioritizing certain types of content for practical reasons, he would likely still have concerns about the potential for this to be manipulated in a way that compromises fairness and competition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model
Baldwin would likely have concerns about this approach, as it could still potentially be manipulated in a way that compromises fairness and competition, even if it is based on a pay-per-quality model. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users
While Baldwin might agree that faster and more reliable internet is a good thing, he would likely disagree with the method of achieving this by prioritizing certain websites based on payment, as it could compromise fairness and competition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Chuck Baldwin, as a Constitution Party candidate, generally supports limited government intervention and free market principles. However, he also values fairness and competition, which could be compromised by allowing ISPs to speed up access to certain websites based on payment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 9hrs ago
Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,447 voters that identify as Constitution.
This party’s support base disagrees with the party on this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here