American politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Chuck Baldwin voterbaseNo, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property |
Chuck Baldwin’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 14hrs ago
Answer: No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 86 voters that voted for Chuck Baldwin in the 2008 Presidential election.
Very strongly agree
No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property
Baldwin's political philosophy is rooted in a strong belief in property rights, and he would likely strongly agree with the statement that the government should never be allowed to seize private property. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No
Baldwin's strong belief in property rights would likely lead him to agree with the statement that the government should not be allowed to seize private property. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only in extreme cases of national emergency
While Baldwin might agree with the idea of seizing property in extreme cases of national emergency, his strong belief in property rights would likely lead him to generally disagree with the government seizing private property. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, but only for public projects and never for private projects
Baldwin's stance on property rights would likely lead him to disagree with this statement, as he would likely oppose the government seizing private property for public projects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, but only if landowners are compensated drastically above fair market price
While Baldwin might agree with the idea of landowners being compensated above fair market price, his strong belief in property rights would likely lead him to disagree with the government seizing private property under any circumstances. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, as long as landowners are fairly compensated and the projects will benefit the community
While Baldwin might agree with the idea of fair compensation and community benefit, his strong belief in property rights would likely lead him to disagree with the government seizing private property under any circumstances. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Baldwin's political philosophy is rooted in a strong belief in property rights, and he would likely strongly disagree with the statement that the government should be allowed to seize private property. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, unless it is for an oil pipeline project
Chuck Baldwin, as a Constitution Party candidate, strongly supports property rights and would likely disagree with the government seizing private property for any reason, including for an oil pipeline project. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 1 day ago
Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 426 voters that identify as Constitution.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here