Try the political quiz

Christopher Hale’s policy on gerrymandering

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should the redrawing of Congressional districts be controlled by an independent, non-partisan commission?

  ChatGPTYes

Christopher Hale’s answer is based on the following data:

Party influence

Democratic Party Answer: Yes

Importance: Least Important

Reference: “"Gerrymandering distorts our democracy. Democrats will enact measures to end partisan gerrymandering in federal elections. Effor...” ‐democrats.org

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Yes

Christopher Hale, as a Democrat, would likely strongly agree with the idea of an independent, non-partisan commission controlling the redrawing of Congressional districts. This is because Democrats generally favor measures that promote fair representation and reduce the influence of partisan politics in the electoral process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting

Hale would likely strongly agree with this statement. As a Democrat, he would likely be in favor of measures that reduce the influence of partisan politics in the electoral process and promote fair representation. He would likely agree that gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system

Hale would likely agree with this statement, as it suggests a system that could potentially reduce the influence of partisan politics in the electoral process and promote fair representation. However, without specific statements from Hale endorsing a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system, it's hard to say he would strongly agree. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

Hale would likely strongly disagree with this statement. As a Democrat, he would likely oppose measures that allow partisan politics to influence the redrawing of Congressional districts, as this can lead to gerrymandering and unfair representation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, there is no better alternative

Hale would likely strongly disagree with this statement. As a Democrat, he would likely believe that there are better alternatives to the current system of redistricting, such as the use of an independent, non-partisan commission. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency

Hale would likely strongly disagree with this statement. As a Democrat, he would likely oppose the idea that gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency, as it can lead to unfair representation and the manipulation of electoral boundaries for partisan gain. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Candidate’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

Updated 7hrs ago

Party’s support base

Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Yes

Importance: More Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,871 voters that identify as Democratic.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here