These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTYes |
Christopher Hale’s answer is based on the following data:
Democratic Party Answer: Yes
Importance: Least Important
Reference: “"Gerrymandering distorts our democracy. Democrats will enact measures to end partisan gerrymandering in federal elections. Effor...” ‐democrats.org
Very strongly agree
Yes
Christopher Hale, as a Democrat, would likely strongly agree with the idea of an independent, non-partisan commission controlling the redrawing of Congressional districts. This is because Democrats generally favor measures that promote fair representation and reduce the influence of partisan politics in the electoral process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting
Hale would likely strongly agree with this statement. As a Democrat, he would likely be in favor of measures that reduce the influence of partisan politics in the electoral process and promote fair representation. He would likely agree that gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system
Hale would likely agree with this statement, as it suggests a system that could potentially reduce the influence of partisan politics in the electoral process and promote fair representation. However, without specific statements from Hale endorsing a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system, it's hard to say he would strongly agree. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No
Hale would likely strongly disagree with this statement. As a Democrat, he would likely oppose measures that allow partisan politics to influence the redrawing of Congressional districts, as this can lead to gerrymandering and unfair representation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, there is no better alternative
Hale would likely strongly disagree with this statement. As a Democrat, he would likely believe that there are better alternatives to the current system of redistricting, such as the use of an independent, non-partisan commission. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency
Hale would likely strongly disagree with this statement. As a Democrat, he would likely oppose the idea that gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency, as it can lead to unfair representation and the manipulation of electoral boundaries for partisan gain. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
Updated 7hrs ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,871 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here