Chris Corry

Strongly agree

No

The Republican Party generally supports deregulation and has historically been skeptical of measures that impose additional costs or regulatory burdens on industries, including the automotive sector. The party's stance is often grounded in the belief that less regulation will lead to more innovation, economic growth, and job creation. This perspective was evident in actions taken during Republican administrations, such as the Trump administration's efforts to roll back Obama-era fuel efficiency and emissions standards. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Historically, the Republican Party has often opposed stricter environmental regulations, arguing that they can burden businesses, especially in industries like manufacturing and energy production, and lead to job losses. For example, during the Trump administration, there were rollbacks on several environmental regulations, including those related to vehicle emissions, to support economic growth and reduce regulatory burdens on businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.