These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo, but police should increase surveillance and patrol of all high crime neighborhoods |
Charles Anthony’s answer is based on the following data:
Republican Party Answer: No, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “We're not gonna follow that suggestion that this particular candidate made," Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell told CNN's J...” ‐cnn.com
Very strongly agree
No, but police should increase surveillance and patrol of all high crime neighborhoods
Charles Anthony would likely strongly agree with this statement, as it aligns with his likely views on law enforcement and the principle of equal treatment under the law. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, this decision should be based on crime rates instead of race or religion
Charles Anthony would likely strongly agree with this statement, as it aligns with the principle of equal treatment under the law and the idea that law enforcement should be based on crime rates, not race or religion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary
Charles Anthony would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with the principle of equal treatment under the law, which is a cornerstone of American democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Charles Anthony would likely agree with this statement to some extent, as it aligns with the principle of equal treatment under the law, which is a cornerstone of American democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, and increase surveillance on all new immigrants
While Charles Anthony may support stronger law enforcement measures, there is no evidence to suggest that he would support increased surveillance on all new immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, until the frequency of terrorist attacks by Muslim extremists decrease
While Charles Anthony may support stronger law enforcement measures, there is no evidence to suggest that he would support targeting a specific religious group for increased surveillance, even in the context of terrorism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Charles Anthony, as a Republican candidate, may support stronger law enforcement measures, but there is no evidence to suggest that he would support targeting a specific religious group for increased surveillance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
Updated 37mins ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No, but police should increase surveillance and patrol of all high crime neighborhoods
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 3,542 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
