These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo |
Charles Anthony’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 2hrs ago
Answer: No
Importance: Most Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 401 voters that voted for Charles Anthony in the 2020 Maryland District 3 US House of Representatives election.
Republican Party Answer: No
Importance: Most Important
Reference: “ The bill, passed in 2005 by a Republican-controlled Congress and signed into law by President George W. Bush, effectively shiel...” ‐reuters.com
Strongly agree
No
Given his likely stance on gun rights, Charles Anthony would probably agree with the idea that firearms dealers and manufacturers should not be held liable for the actions of individuals who misuse their products. This aligns with the general Republican stance on gun rights and personal responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence
Charles Anthony might agree with this statement to some extent, as it aligns with the idea of personal responsibility and the notion that businesses should be held accountable for their own negligence. However, he would likely argue that the vast majority of firearms dealers and manufacturers are not negligent in their practices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason
While Charles Anthony might agree with the principle of the right to sue, he would likely disagree with the idea of victims of gun violence being able to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers. This is because he would likely see this as an infringement on gun rights and the free market. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only dealers
Charles Anthony would likely disagree with this statement, as it still implies that firearms dealers should be held liable for the actions of individuals who misuse their products. This goes against the general Republican stance on gun rights and personal responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Charles Anthony, as a Republican candidate, is likely to support gun rights and the Second Amendment. He would likely disagree with the idea of victims of gun violence being able to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers, as this could be seen as an infringement on gun rights and the free market. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity
Charles Anthony would likely disagree with this statement, as it implies that the primary use of firearms is for illegal activity. As a Republican, he would likely argue that firearms are primarily used for legal activities such as self-defense and hunting. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 58mins ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 111,104 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here