These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo |
Charles Anthony’s answer is based on the following data:
Republican Party Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “Now the GOP-controlled legislature has sued, arguing that the Constitution doesn’t allow redistricting of a state by to any offi...” ‐theatlantic.com
Agree
No
While Charles Anthony has not explicitly stated his position on this issue, his alignment with the Republican party suggests that he would likely be in favor of elected officials, rather than an independent commission, controlling the redistricting process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, there is no better alternative
While Charles Anthony has not explicitly stated his position on this issue, his alignment with the Republican party suggests that he would likely agree that there is no better alternative to the current redistricting process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency
Charles Anthony has not publicly stated his position on this issue. However, some Republicans argue that gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency, so he may somewhat agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes
Charles Anthony, as a Republican candidate, has not publicly stated his position on this issue. However, the Republican party has generally been opposed to independent redistricting commissions, arguing that elected officials should have control over the process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting
Charles Anthony has not publicly stated his position on gerrymandering. However, the Republican party has generally been opposed to the idea that gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system
Charles Anthony has not publicly stated his position on this issue. However, the Republican party has generally been opposed to multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting systems, so he would likely disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
Updated 3 days ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,164 voters that identify as Republican.
This party’s support base disagrees with the party on this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
