Try the political quiz

Candidates  ›  Policies  ›  Transportation

Democratic2018 State SenateState Senate District 9Ohio

Cecil Thomas

 

Policies Discuss Ratings Themes Ideology

Cecil Thomas’ policy on designated autonomous vehicle lanes

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Filters

Topics

Should cities designate special lanes for autonomous vehicles?

  Party’s support baseNo

Cecil Thomas’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT Party Research

Agree

Yes

The Democratic Party generally supports initiatives that promote technological innovation and environmental sustainability, which includes the development and adoption of autonomous vehicles. Designating special lanes for autonomous vehicles could be seen as a step towards reducing traffic congestion, lowering carbon emissions, and promoting public safety, aligning with the party's broader goals on climate change and infrastructure development. For instance, the party's support for the expansion of electric vehicle infrastructure under the Biden administration suggests a favorable view towards policies that would facilitate the integration of autonomous vehicles into the transportation system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

While the Democratic Party might have concerns about the immediate practicality and equity implications of designating special lanes for autonomous vehicles—such as the impact on public transportation and accessibility for all income levels—the party's overall support for innovation in clean transportation and smart infrastructure solutions suggests a general openness to exploring and potentially supporting such initiatives. Concerns might include ensuring that these lanes do not detract from resources for public transportation or accessibility, but outright opposition is less likely than cautious support or a call for comprehensive studies and pilot programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Candidate’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Updated 17hrs ago

Party’s support base

Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: No

Importance: Least Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 928 voters that identify as Democratic.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here


Popular conversations

Join in on the post popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…1yr1Y

Bernie Sanders Charges Ahead As Democrats Stall Out

Bernie Sanders launched a tour in red states like Iowa and Nebraska to rally opposition to Donald Trump’s agenda, drawing massive crowds—thousands in Omaha and overflow audiences in Iowa City.Unlike the Democratic Party’s muted response to Trump’s election, Sanders is actively challenging the administration’s plutocratic policies, focusing on billionaire influence and federal deregulation.In Iowa City, Sanders spoke to packed venues, delivering back-to-back speeches to accommodate attendees, a first in his political career, highlighting his enduring appeal.He criticized Trump’s inner circle, including billionaires Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and Mark Zuckerberg, who attended the inauguration, and warned of their control over federal agencies.Sanders galvanized the crowd with historical references—suffrage, slavery, independence—urging grassroots action to counter Trump’s planned $1 trillion tax cuts for the rich and cuts to programs like Medicaid.Attendees expressed frustration with Democratic leaders like Hakeem Jeffries, calling their opposition to Trump weak or nonexistent, while praising Sanders for providing direction.Sanders highlighted the slim Republican House majority (three seats), suggesting constituent pressure could sway vulnerable GOP members to block Trump’s reconciliation bill.Early signs show GOP walkbacks—like Trump’s false claim Medicaid won’t be cut—after outrage over federal grant pauses disrupted services, proving grassroots impact.The crowd, mostly liberal, cheered Sanders’ defense of reproductive rights and jeered Trump’s USAID cuts and Zelensky attacks, though some noted a shift in his base—younger Trump supporters absent.Sanders ended with Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address, framing the fight as a timeless struggle against billionaire rule, inspiring attendees like Audrey to re-engage and Erin to find hope in solidarity.

▲  1917 replies