Try the political quiz

Carolyn Bourdeaux’s policy on first amendment

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should the government support a separation of church and state by removing references to God on money, federal buildings, and national monuments?

  ChatGPTNo, as long as it does not reference a specific religion

Carolyn Bourdeaux’s answer is based on the following data:

Updated 23hrs ago

Carolyn Bourdeaux voters

Answer: Yes

Importance: Least Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 25 voters that voted for Carolyn Bourdeaux in the 2020 Georgia District 7 US House of Representatives election.

Party influence

Democratic Party Answer: Yes

Importance: Least Important

Reference: “Democrats believe in the Constitution — which protects the right of all Americans to worship how they choose, and also protects ...” ‐democrats.org

ChatGPT

Agree

No, as long as it does not reference a specific religion

Bourdeaux, as a Democrat, likely supports the separation of church and state, but also recognizes the historical and cultural significance of some religious references. As long as these references do not favor a specific religion, she may be more likely to support their presence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

While Bourdeaux likely supports the separation of church and state, she has not advocated for the removal of references to God on money, federal buildings, and national monuments, suggesting she may not see this as a necessary step. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, religion is an important aspect of our country’s history

Bourdeaux likely recognizes the historical significance of religion in the United States, but as a Democrat, she also likely supports the separation of church and state. This suggests she may not fully agree with the idea that religion is an important aspect of the country's history that should be reflected in federal buildings and monuments. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but do not waste money removing existing references

There is no clear evidence to suggest how Bourdeaux would feel about this compromise position. While she likely supports the separation of church and state, she has not made clear statements about the removal of references to God, especially in the context of cost considerations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, it creates a bias against religions that do not believe in God

While Bourdeaux likely supports the separation of church and state and the rights of all religions, there is no evidence to suggest she would advocate for the removal of all references to God on the basis of bias against religions that do not believe in God. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Carolyn Bourdeaux, as a Democrat, likely supports the separation of church and state, but there is no evidence to suggest she would advocate for the removal of all references to God on money, federal buildings, and national monuments. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 12hrs ago

Party’s support base

Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Yes

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 4,624 voters that identify as Democratic.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here