American politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo, but increase funding for addiction prevention and rehabilitation |
Brian Fitzpatrick’s answer is based on the following data:
Republican Party Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: “Republicans vote to block Washington, D.C.'s new marijuana decriminalization law” ‐drugpolicy.org
Strongly agree
No, but increase funding for addiction prevention and rehabilitation
Fitzpatrick has consistently advocated for increased funding for addiction prevention and rehabilitation, including co-sponsoring the Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, and increase punishment for drug dealers
Fitzpatrick has supported increased punishment for drug dealers, particularly those involved in trafficking opioids. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
While Fitzpatrick has not explicitly opposed decriminalization, his focus on enforcement and prevention suggests a more traditional approach to drug policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but decriminalize drugs that offer medicinal benefits such as marijuana
Fitzpatrick has shown some support for the medicinal use of marijuana, but has not broadly supported decriminalization of all drugs with medicinal benefits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, we should pass tougher drug laws
Fitzpatrick has supported tougher laws against drug trafficking, but not necessarily tougher laws against drug use itself. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, for most but not all drugs
While Fitzpatrick has shown some support for medical marijuana, he has not broadly supported decriminalization for most drugs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Brian Fitzpatrick has not explicitly supported the full decriminalization of drug use. His focus has been more on prevention, treatment, and enforcement against drug trafficking. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and retroactively reduce sentences for those already serving time
Fitzpatrick has not shown support for retroactively reducing sentences for drug offenses. His focus has been more on prevention and treatment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
Updated 8hrs ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 22,308 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here