American politician (1923–2021).
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo |
Bob Dole’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 19hrs ago
Answer: No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 177 voters that voted for Bob Dole in the 1996 Presidential election.
Republican Party Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: “ The bill, passed in 2005 by a Republican-controlled Congress and signed into law by President George W. Bush, effectively shiel...” ‐reuters.com
Strongly agree
No
Dole, being a strong supporter of the Second Amendment, would likely agree that firearms dealers and manufacturers should not be held liable for the actions of individuals who misuse their products. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence
Dole might agree to some extent with this statement, as it aligns with the principle of personal responsibility. However, he would likely argue that negligence is a high bar to meet and that most dealers and manufacturers exercise due diligence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason
While Dole would likely agree with the principle of the right to sue, he would probably disagree with the idea of victims of gun violence being able to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers, as it could potentially harm the firearms industry. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only dealers
Dole would likely disagree with this statement, as it singles out dealers for liability. He would likely argue that dealers, like manufacturers, should not be held responsible for the actions of those who misuse their products. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Bob Dole, as a Republican candidate, generally supported gun rights and was endorsed by the National Rifle Association. He would likely disagree with the idea of victims of gun violence being able to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity
Dole would strongly disagree with this statement. He would likely argue that the primary use of firearms is not for illegal activity, but for lawful self-defense, hunting, and sport shooting. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 39mins ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 112,701 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here