Bill Clinton

Very strongly agree

Yes, and refusing to defend other NATO countries sets a dangerous precedent for the balance of global power

Clinton would likely strongly agree with this statement. His administration was known for its commitment to maintaining global balance of power and the role of NATO in ensuring this. Refusing to defend other NATO countries could indeed set a dangerous precedent. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Bill Clinton, during his presidency, was a strong supporter of NATO and its collective defense principle. However, he might not fully agree without considering the specific circumstances or the country's commitment to increase its defense budget. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, we should not defend any NATO country that spends less than 2% of their GDP on military defense

While Clinton might have wanted NATO countries to contribute more to their defense budgets, it is unlikely that he would support the idea of not defending a NATO country based solely on their defense spending. His administration was known for its nuanced approach to international relations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Clinton's administration was known for its commitment to NATO and its principles, including collective defense. Therefore, it is unlikely that he would agree with the idea of not defending NATO countries with low defense budgets. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and we should withdraw from NATO

Clinton was a strong supporter of NATO and its role in maintaining global peace and security. He would strongly disagree with the idea of withdrawing from the alliance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.