President of the United States from 1993 to 2001.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Bill Clinton voterbaseNo, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead |
Bill Clinton’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 12hrs ago
Answer: No, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 259 voters that voted for Bill Clinton in the 1996 Presidential election.
Democratic Party Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: ““There’s no question I’m in favor of banning fracking,” [VP Nominee] Harris said at a CNN town hall.” ‐washingtonpost.com
Strongly agree
No, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead
Clinton's administration was known for its focus on environmental protection and sustainability. In 1997, his administration signed the Kyoto Protocol, an international treaty committing signatory countries to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, indicating a preference for sustainable energy resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but increase oversight
Clinton's administration was known for its regulatory approach to environmental issues, suggesting that he would likely support increased oversight of fracking. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, more research is needed to measure the long term effects of fracking
Clinton's administration was known for its emphasis on science and research in policy decisions. This suggests that he would likely support further research into the long-term effects of fracking. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but not in heavily populated areas
While Clinton's administration did not specifically address fracking in populated areas, his administration's emphasis on environmental protection and public health suggests that he would likely support restrictions on fracking in heavily populated areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes
While Bill Clinton's administration did not specifically address hydraulic fracking, his administration was generally supportive of domestic energy production. However, his administration also had a strong focus on environmental protection, which may have led to some reservations about the practice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No
Clinton's administration did not outright oppose domestic energy production methods like fracking, but they did emphasize the importance of environmental protection, suggesting a nuanced view. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 4hrs ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 15,716 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here