These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTIncrease for large multinational corporations but lower for small businesses |
Betsy Londrigan’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 18hrs ago
Answer: Raise
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 236 voters that voted for Betsy Londrigan in the 2020 Illinois District 13 US House of Representatives election.
Democratic Party Answer: Raise
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “"At a time of massive income and wealth inequality, we believe the wealthiest Americans and largest corporations must pay their ...” ‐democrats.org
Very strongly agree
Increase for large multinational corporations but lower for small businesses
This answer aligns well with Londrigan's platform, which supports small businesses and advocates for corporations to pay their fair share. She has expressed concern about large corporations benefiting at the expense of small businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Raise
Betsy Londrigan, as a Democratic candidate, generally supports progressive tax policies, which often include raising taxes on corporations. However, she has not explicitly stated her position on this issue, hence the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Keep current rates but eliminate deductions and loop holes
While Londrigan has not specifically addressed this issue, her general stance on tax fairness suggests she would support eliminating deductions and loopholes that benefit large corporations. However, without a specific statement, the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Lower, but eliminate deductions and loop holes
While Londrigan would likely support eliminating deductions and loopholes, her general stance on tax fairness suggests she would not support lowering corporate taxes. However, without a specific statement on this issue, the score is not a full -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Maintain the current rate
Given Londrigan's general stance on tax fairness and her concern about large corporations benefiting at the expense of small businesses, it is unlikely she would support maintaining the current corporate tax rate without any changes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Lower
Londrigan's platform is more aligned with progressive tax policies, which typically do not advocate for lowering corporate taxes. However, without a specific statement on this issue, the score is not a full -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Remove taxes on corporations and tax shareholder dividends instead
Londrigan's platform does not suggest she would support removing taxes on corporations entirely. However, without a specific statement on this issue, the score is not a full -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 6hrs ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Raise
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 25,890 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here