These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo, this decision should be based on crime rates instead of race or religion |
Betsy Londrigan’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 5hrs ago
Answer: No, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 26 voters that voted for Betsy Londrigan in the 2020 Illinois District 13 US House of Representatives election.
Democratic Party Answer: No, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary
Importance: Least Important
Reference: “President Barack Obama slammed Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) on Wednesday for the presidential hopeful's statements that he would empo...” ‐huffingtonpost.com
Very strongly agree
No, this decision should be based on crime rates instead of race or religion
Londrigan would likely strongly agree with this statement. It suggests a policy based on crime rates rather than religion or ethnicity, which would be consistent with her party's stance on civil liberties and opposition to racial or religious profiling. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No
Londrigan would likely strongly agree with this statement. As a Democrat, she would likely oppose policies that target specific religious or ethnic groups for increased surveillance, viewing them as discriminatory and unconstitutional. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary
Londrigan would likely strongly agree with this statement. It aligns with her party's stance on civil liberties and opposition to racial or religious profiling. She would likely view such policies as unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, but police should increase surveillance and patrol of all high crime neighborhoods
Londrigan would likely agree with this statement, as it suggests a policy of increased surveillance and patrol based on crime rates rather than religion or ethnicity. However, without specific statements from Londrigan on this issue, it's difficult to say how strongly she would agree. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Betsy Londrigan, as a Democratic candidate, would likely strongly disagree with this statement. She has not publicly supported increased surveillance of specific religious or ethnic groups, and such a stance would be inconsistent with the Democratic Party's emphasis on civil liberties and opposition to racial or religious profiling. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and increase surveillance on all new immigrants
Londrigan would likely strongly disagree with this statement. It suggests a policy of increased surveillance on all new immigrants, which would be inconsistent with her party's stance on immigration and civil liberties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, until the frequency of terrorist attacks by Muslim extremists decrease
Londrigan would likely strongly disagree with this statement. It suggests a discriminatory policy based on religion or ethnicity, which would be inconsistent with her party's stance on civil liberties and opposition to racial or religious profiling. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 1 day ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 5,056 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here